Let's Collect News The Practice vs. "The Good"
Hello! With the proximity of the last two major tournaments we have before the release of Dragon's Maze (World Magic Cup Qualifier and the PTQ Theros Dublin, both organized by Let's Collect), judged and relevant approach a topic that always yields cloth sleeve during preparation for tournaments - what is "good"?
The _Batutinha_ himself raised this issue recently in one of his last articles, which made me reflect on the existence of "good" in a format uhrenzubehör specific uhrenzubehör to each tournament. But the point is that it also addresses the real "good" is playing a deck with potential uhrenzubehör to be Tier 1, you feel confident and familiar.
First of all, a brief definition of what is "good". The good, the players as popularly called, is the deck that will be better uhrenzubehör prepared for a particular tournament. For example, analyzing the context of the environment for the latter GPs Standard in Rio de Janeiro and in Verona, much was said about the "good" being Junk Reanimator - which actually ended up confirming given to good performances on both the deck competitions. The main reason of it being "good" is that the game was against aggros while earning Jund and UWR midrange, both decks most anticipated / popular.
So what is the correct answer to the question of choice deck before major tournaments? It depends. Yes, depends, and try to get closer to an answer to this question is what I intend to today's article.
We know that there are different levels of competition in Magic: The Gathering (FNMS, Game Days, PTQs, GPTs, GPs, PTs) and that each of these players often attract certain types, but covering all intentions. These can be anything from fun playing without worrying about results, winning several and several uhrenzubehör boosters with a low investment registration, surpass themselves doing the best possible outcome, "grind" uhrenzubehör Planeswalker points, uhrenzubehör attempting to join the professional uhrenzubehör circuit or even keep If him.
Thus, it is natural that we have players with different levels within the game tournaments. uhrenzubehör A player with years of experience in competitive tournaments, which devotes several hours a day to training, reading and theorizing format with your team will most likely be a player of higher level than the casual player who dispute FNMS twice a month with a deck missing cards or to the player who has had results of expression but is more "rusty", for example.
But as someone who happens to end up finding "good" on the eve of the tournament, and yet have extremely well with the deck, making very few mistakes in strategy and achieving a good result?
The obvious answer would be - because this guy is a player good to excellent level of play. A more elaborate answer would be because he has years of experienced situations in matches, experience, holistic knowledge of the format, as well as a solid base of established concepts (time, decision making, reading plays, etc.) - which I classify as " Baggage. "
So if someone discovers "good" for a particular tournament and passes it last minute for that player, it will be able to understand what the deck does understand why the cards are there, how he should behave in terms of roles against environmental tiers 1 (if it is the beatdown or control in each game), and the like as sidear, successfully extracting a good result result even without having gone to practice with the heavy deck.
Although all competitive players who aspire to something more in the Magic are able to assimilate the information more or less, this process is much simpler for a player of the highest level. Often see someone who has won a major tournament without having trained with the deck or editing without having drafted not once, but all the "baggage" previously acquired certainly was decisive.
To illustrate this scenario, I remember two events in which the PV played with decks that have emerged as "good" for a particular uhrenzubehör tournament, and have not been tested exhaustively in advance at the same (he correct me if I'm wrong). They are the Top 4 in GP Barcelona in 2009, the Standard LRW-ARB-format 10th, riding the Cascade Swans Combo; and victory in the National 2006 Standard in CHK-DIS-9th format riding the Snow UW Enduring Ideal.
Were decks that came as surprises in the environment, without the opponents have answers? Of course. But did not have a great "baggage" of play before these tournaments, the results might have been very different for our beloved Hall of Fame brazuca.
And what are the reasons uhrenzubehör that make a player chooses one, at most two choices of decks
Hello! With the proximity of the last two major tournaments we have before the release of Dragon's Maze (World Magic Cup Qualifier and the PTQ Theros Dublin, both organized by Let's Collect), judged and relevant approach a topic that always yields cloth sleeve during preparation for tournaments - what is "good"?
The _Batutinha_ himself raised this issue recently in one of his last articles, which made me reflect on the existence of "good" in a format uhrenzubehör specific uhrenzubehör to each tournament. But the point is that it also addresses the real "good" is playing a deck with potential uhrenzubehör to be Tier 1, you feel confident and familiar.
First of all, a brief definition of what is "good". The good, the players as popularly called, is the deck that will be better uhrenzubehör prepared for a particular tournament. For example, analyzing the context of the environment for the latter GPs Standard in Rio de Janeiro and in Verona, much was said about the "good" being Junk Reanimator - which actually ended up confirming given to good performances on both the deck competitions. The main reason of it being "good" is that the game was against aggros while earning Jund and UWR midrange, both decks most anticipated / popular.
So what is the correct answer to the question of choice deck before major tournaments? It depends. Yes, depends, and try to get closer to an answer to this question is what I intend to today's article.
We know that there are different levels of competition in Magic: The Gathering (FNMS, Game Days, PTQs, GPTs, GPs, PTs) and that each of these players often attract certain types, but covering all intentions. These can be anything from fun playing without worrying about results, winning several and several uhrenzubehör boosters with a low investment registration, surpass themselves doing the best possible outcome, "grind" uhrenzubehör Planeswalker points, uhrenzubehör attempting to join the professional uhrenzubehör circuit or even keep If him.
Thus, it is natural that we have players with different levels within the game tournaments. uhrenzubehör A player with years of experience in competitive tournaments, which devotes several hours a day to training, reading and theorizing format with your team will most likely be a player of higher level than the casual player who dispute FNMS twice a month with a deck missing cards or to the player who has had results of expression but is more "rusty", for example.
But as someone who happens to end up finding "good" on the eve of the tournament, and yet have extremely well with the deck, making very few mistakes in strategy and achieving a good result?
The obvious answer would be - because this guy is a player good to excellent level of play. A more elaborate answer would be because he has years of experienced situations in matches, experience, holistic knowledge of the format, as well as a solid base of established concepts (time, decision making, reading plays, etc.) - which I classify as " Baggage. "
So if someone discovers "good" for a particular tournament and passes it last minute for that player, it will be able to understand what the deck does understand why the cards are there, how he should behave in terms of roles against environmental tiers 1 (if it is the beatdown or control in each game), and the like as sidear, successfully extracting a good result result even without having gone to practice with the heavy deck.
Although all competitive players who aspire to something more in the Magic are able to assimilate the information more or less, this process is much simpler for a player of the highest level. Often see someone who has won a major tournament without having trained with the deck or editing without having drafted not once, but all the "baggage" previously acquired certainly was decisive.
To illustrate this scenario, I remember two events in which the PV played with decks that have emerged as "good" for a particular uhrenzubehör tournament, and have not been tested exhaustively in advance at the same (he correct me if I'm wrong). They are the Top 4 in GP Barcelona in 2009, the Standard LRW-ARB-format 10th, riding the Cascade Swans Combo; and victory in the National 2006 Standard in CHK-DIS-9th format riding the Snow UW Enduring Ideal.
Were decks that came as surprises in the environment, without the opponents have answers? Of course. But did not have a great "baggage" of play before these tournaments, the results might have been very different for our beloved Hall of Fame brazuca.
And what are the reasons uhrenzubehör that make a player chooses one, at most two choices of decks
No comments:
Post a Comment